91天堂原創

CFPB Takes Aim At BNPL Regulatory Loopholes In The US

June 28, 2024
Back
The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has vowed to close regulatory loopholes that benefit buy now, pay later (BNPL) lenders, in an effort to regulate the sector in the same way as credit cards.

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has vowed to close regulatory loopholes that benefit buy now, pay later (BNPL) lenders, in an effort to regulate the sector in the same way as credit cards.

Speaking this month at a Senate Banking Committee hearing, CFPB director Rohit Chopra on a new interpretive rule that could soon affect the BNPL sector.

鈥淭he CFPB cannot be behind the eight ball when it comes to BNPL,鈥 said Chopra, responding to questions from Senator Jack Reed (D-RI).

鈥淲e have tried to stay ahead of it. It is fast-growing, it's an important part of our consumer credit market, and we need to make sure it's growing on merits, not based on regulatory loopholes.鈥

BNPL providers are already subject to some federal and state oversight. The CFPB has enforcement authority over providers of credit, and it has authority to supervise any non-depository covered persons, such as BNPL companies, in certain circumstances.

Some states consider BNPL to be consumer credit and require state licensing or registration, as well as compliance with state consumer credit laws, while other states do not require licensing or registration for 鈥渋nterest-free鈥 BNPL products.

Chopra, who was on Capitol Hill to discuss the findings of the CFPB's semi-annual report to Congress, said the agency would benefit from greater authority to ensure that BNPL companies are subject to supervision.聽

In May, the CFPB issued an聽 clarifying that many of the rules that apply to credit cards should also apply to BNPL products.

Senator Reed was sympathetic to Chopra鈥檚 demands, suggesting that the CFPB should 鈥渂ring the biggest BNPL lenders under federal supervision in order to spot violations鈥.

Among lawmakers, additional concerns include the failure of credit reporting bureaus to include BNPL loans on their filings 鈥 a loophole that is causing increased anxiety for auto and mortgage lenders.聽

The value of thoughtful regulation

础谤辞耻苍诲听 of all BNPL users worldwide live in the US. Affirm is one of the largest BNPL providers in the US, and its customer base is largely composed of Gen Z and Millennial users.

In a聽 responding to the CFPB鈥檚 interpretive rule, Affirm said it is encouraged by the regulator鈥檚 consistent attempts to promote industry standards. It also said that, in the case of BNPL, these standards 鈥渁lready reflect how Affirm operates鈥.

Speaking to 91天堂原創, an Affirm spokesperson said the company has long been a vocal supporter of efforts, including thoughtful regulation, that can promote greater choice and transparency for consumers.

鈥淲e believe that consistent standards and a level playing field could be an opportunity for honest financial products to go further mainstream,鈥 they said.

鈥淎ffirm is subject to extensive regulation and oversight, both directly and indirectly, by way of our partnerships with our originating banks, under federal law and under the laws of the states in which we operate.鈥

Affirm highlighted that it does not charge late fees or any other hidden fees, and each of its users receive "Truth in Lending" disclosure in line with Federal Reserve regulations on responsible credit provision.

鈥淲e underwrite every transaction, provide consistent and transparent disclosures and offer dispute and error resolution processes,鈥 the spokesperson said.

CFPB enforcement spree against 'deceptive' lenders continues

During the hearing, Chopra gave further insight into the CFPB鈥檚 decision to launch an enforcement action last month against SoLo Funds, a non-bank peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platform.

The regulator alleges that SoLo Funds has engaged in 鈥渄eceiving borrowers鈥 and 鈥渋llegally extracting fees鈥 from them.

SoLo Funds advertises zero-interest loans, but the platform allegedly uses so-called 鈥渄ark patterns鈥 to ensure that almost every borrower pays a 鈥渢ip鈥 or a 鈥渄onation鈥.

Although SoLo funds does not market itself as a BNPL company, Chopra said it is being treated as such by the bureau.

鈥淚f they are pushing people into a finance charge, federal law is pretty clear that they need to disclose it clearly with an interest rate so that people can compare,鈥 said Chopra.

鈥淎nd as Senator Scott was mentioning, we need to be able to look and compare so the best player wins.鈥


聽 聽 聽



聽 聽 聽

Our premium content is available to users of our services.

To view articles, please Log-in to your account, or sign up today for full access:

Opt in to hear about webinars, events, industry and product news

Still can鈥檛 find what you鈥檙e looking for? Get in touch to speak to a member of our team, and we鈥檒l do our best to answer.
No items found.